Wednesday, May 11, 2005

More re-alignment to come.

It's going to happen, but it's taking too long. Mark Schmitt:

When I first started following congressional races closely, in 1988 or so, I remember that a good number of the competitve seats were in the Carolinas. But these were districts that had been voting for Reagan, and yet still sent Democrats to Washington. They were becoming Republican districts, and their apparent "competitiveness" reflected a deadlock between the incumbency advantages and moderation of their Democratic rep, and the ideological claims of the Republican challenger. It sometimes took a few tries before the Republican broke through, and the Republican takeover in 1994 was really the sound of the last dominoes falling. Today and in the years ahead, the competitive districts will be those historically Republican Northeast and Midwest districts that have been voting for Democrats for President. For now, Republicans like Chris Shays, Nancy Johnson and Mark Kirk hold on, either they will step aside or they will eventually lose, and at that point, the districts will cease to seem "competitive" but will become the Democratic districts they are meant to be, and the "moderate Republican" will become extinct.

Comments:
Watch Pennsylvania. Rendell working together with Casey represents the sort of Clinton New Democrat (really not so different from Tom Ridge-R) working with the lunchpail-All the Right Moves Old Democratic Party to oust the Xtian Right Santorum. I really don't see why this coalition wouldn't work throughout the Big 10 -- PA is certainly not as Democrat-friendly as Minnesota, Illinois or Michigan, and probably pretty similar to Ohio and Iowa.

Specter represents the dynamic described in the block quote, but in reverse. Were he not the incumbent last year, his seat would've flipped. So too with Santorum, who barely beat Klink in 2000.
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]